Wednesday, April 15, 2009


WASHINGTON – Bill Darker grinned as he headed into the operating room for a dramatic experiment: A super-high dose of chemotherapy dripped directly into his cancer-ridden liver, 10 times more than patients normally can tolerate.
Not to fear. Working through small puncture holes, doctors sealed off Darker's liver and washed most of the toxic medication from his blood so it didn't poison the rest of his body.
It's a rigorous effort to fight a notorious killer, cancer that has spread to the liver from elsewhere in the body and left patients with few options and little time.
"I've always wanted to treat this cancer very aggressively since I know the prognosis is very dim," said Darker, 46, who managed to save his eye from ocular melanoma only to have the cancer spread tentacles in his liver. "I just take the gloves off and go for it."
Three times, so far, he has flown from his home in Imperial Beach, Calif., to the National Institutes of Health in suburban Washington to repeat the experimental therapy. Before his last round, Darker's liver tumors had shrunk by about a third.
Now a study at NIH and 10 other hospitals nationwide aims to show whether that kind of shrinkage makes enough of a difference in the length and quality of recipients' lives, and is safe enough, for Food and Drug Administration approval to treat eye or skin melanoma that spreads to the liver.
"It seems like a good weapon," said Dr. Marybeth Hughes of the NIH's National Cancer Institute, as she prepared to treat Darker last week. "If it works effectively it would be very important, because the only other choice patients have is constant chemotherapy."
More than 200,000 U.S. patients a year learn that various types of cancer — from the eye, skin, colon, pancreas — have metastasized, or spread, to the liver. Whatever the original tumor type, few survive beyond a year or two.
Often, cancer this aggressive hits multiple organs. But up to 40,000 patients a year have a life-threatening metastasis confined just to the liver. They're the target of the new approach, called PHP, for percutaneous hepatic perfusion. While the melanoma research is furthest along, NIH is beginning smaller studies with certain other liver metastases.
How do you seal off a liver? With balloons similar to those used in heart surgery, only bigger.
Darker lay under general anesthesia as NIH's Dr. Elliott Levy carefully threaded a catheter through an artery in his left leg all the way up to where it branches off into the liver.
Then came catheter No. 2, through a vein in the right leg and up to the vena cava, the highway where blood normally flows from the liver into the heart. This tube bore an uninflated balloon at each end and holes in the middle. Guided by sophisticated X-ray images, Levy inflated the balloons at the top and bottom of the liver, blocking blood's normal exit route.
The tube's holes capture chemo-saturated blood and reroute it out of the body, to a pump where filters scrub away the drug. Filtered blood re-enters the body through a tube in the neck.
It's done with team precision. "Initiating bypass, 10:31," doctors called.
Is the seal good? They injected a dye to be sure. No leaks.
Then Hughes, the oncologist, was up. "Chemo on, 10:45," she called. For 30 minutes, she dripped a concentrated dose of the drug melphalan through catheter No. 1 into the hepatic artery, saturating the liver. The pump is to run for another half-hour after the drug's done, ultimately removing between 80 percent and 90 percent of the chemo.
"The ability to shrink cancers in the livers of patients who failed other therapies is exciting," acknowledged Dr. Neal Meropol, gastrointestinal cancer chief at Fox Chase Cancer Center, who isn't involved with the study. But he said cancer specialists are watching the work very skeptically, because it's such a complex procedure.
It's not that much more complicated than existing treatments that infuse chemo without preventing bodywide leakage, and which have widely varying results, said Dr. James Pingpank, a former NIH researcher now at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, one study site.
Years ago, NIH doctors created an open-surgery version of the treatment that did help but patients could endure it only once. In a partnership with New York-based Delcath Systems Inc., they've made the procedure far less invasive and potentially repeatable — assuming it works — as often needed.
But it's not risk-free. Not all the chemo is removed, so patients suffer some fatigue and a weakened immune system for a few days between treatments. The pump causes blood pressure to temporarily plummet, requiring quick doses of drugs to push it back up. Because every patient's anatomy is slightly different, doctors must carefully map blood vessels to be sure ones that lead, for example, to the stomach aren't so close that chemo could leak in.
First-stage studies reported few serious side effects, although one patient died during an apparently unrelated operation about two weeks after a PHP.
The required operating-room team means if approved, PHP could cost just under $20,000 — hefty, but fairly comparable to some other advanced cancer therapies.
Darker called the procedure easier than standard liver treatments, saying he felt good two days later: "It's running like clockwork."


From Yahoo News

FDA reversal OKs morphine painkiller for dying


By MALCOLM RITTER, AP Science Writer Malcolm Ritter, Ap Science Writer – Fri Apr 10, 4:23 am ET
NEW YORK – A liquid morphine painkiller given by family caregivers to dying patients can remain on the market, federal regulators have decided after hearing protests over their decision to remove it. The Food and Drug Administration had announced last week that it was ordering manufacturers to stop making 14 medications including the liquid morphine. All were developed so long ago they had never received FDA approval.
But on Thursday, the FDA's Dr. Douglas Throckmorton told The Associated Press the morphine liquid will remain on the market until it's replaced by an approved version or some equivalent therapy.
The reversal was welcomed by experts in hospice care and pain relief. One doctors group had told the FDA that last week's order would "cause extreme suffering for many patients who are nearing the end of life."
The order has not changed for the other painkillers, at least for now, said Throckmorton, deputy director of the agency's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
The agency said last week that the unapproved drugs might be unsafe, ineffective or poor quality. The order gave manufacturers 60 days to stop making those products.
The liquid morphine is highly concentrated. Other approved forms of liquid morphine are more dilute, and Throckmorton said the FDA had thought the other forms could take the place of the concentrated form.
But reaction from hospice experts and others "helped us understand" that some patients need the unapproved version, Throckmorton said.
In interviews, experts said they didn't have firm numbers on how many patients use the concentrated liquid. But Dr. Diane Meier, director of the Center to Advance Palliative Care at the Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York, estimated that it may be at least 2 million Americans a year.
She called Thursday's decision "fabulous.... It's incredibly refreshing and makes me hopeful about our government."
The high morphine concentration is crucial, she and others said. It allows caregivers to rapidly relieve pain by placing just a few drops in the mouth of a person who has trouble swallowing, perhaps because of confusion, lethargy or other conditions.
The more dilute morphine requires much more liquid, which could make an impaired person choke or sputter, or refuse to take the medication, experts say.
Caregivers can administer the concentrated solution at home, where morphine shots often aren't a good option. Without the concentrated liquid, families could end up calling 911 to rush their loved ones to an emergency room for morphine shots, which would be expensive and against patient wishes, said Dr. Porter Storey, executive vice president of the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine.
Storey called the FDA reversal "a really important step in the right direction," showing "an amazing level of responsiveness we're not used to seeing in our government officials."
But Storey said he was still concerned about the other painkillers ordered off the market, products containing morphine, hydromorphone or oxycodone.
While approved medications with those ingredients remain on the market, Storey noted that opiate painkillers are in short supply. So rather than removing the unapproved versions all at once, exacerbating the problem, he suggested the FDA proceed more slowly.
In a letter to the FDA earlier this week, Storey's organization said the painkillers covered by last week's order "have been used safely and effectively for decades."
Throckmorton said the FDA is open to getting additional information about the other painkillers, and would discuss them with experts in hospice and palliative care.
But Storey said that in a later phone call with physicians and pharmacists, the FDA said that the order against the other painkillers would stand.
Further shortfalls in painkiller supply could spell trouble for chronic pain patients such as 62-year-old Ora Chaikin in New York City, said her physician, Dr. R. Sean Morrison at Mount Sinai.
Chaikin takes an unapproved version of the drug Dilaudid — hydromorphone — when her joint pain flares, which is typically on most days. She said she needs that medication "just to be able to walk, to be able to do daily activities (like) putting a coat on."
Although approved versions of the drug are available, the FDA order makes Morrison worry about their supply.
"It's already hard to get them," he said.
-Yahoo News

Medication May Improve Scar Healing

THURSDAY, April 9 (HealthDay News) -- The drug avotermin (brand name Juvista) seems to improve the healing of skin scars, according to three new studies.
Some volunteers had avotermin (Human Recombinant TGFa3) administered to their skin before wounding and again 24 hours later to both sides of 1-centimeter incisions that went all the way through the skin of the upper inner arm to the depth of the underlying muscle. Identical wounds were inflicted on other volunteers who received a placebo or standard wound care.
Two studies found that patients who received avotermin scored an average of five points higher on a visual 100-point scale of scar appearance after six months, and an average of eight points higher after one year.
The third study found that all concentrations of avotermin produced significantly improved total scar appearance scores versus placebo -- from 15 points at the 5 nanogram dose up to 64 points at the 500 nanogram dose. The researcher said 60 percent of scars treated with avotermin showed 25 percent or less abnormal orientation of the collagen fibers in the skin, compared with 33 percent of scars treated with placebo.
"Results of these phase 1-2 studies show that avotermin is a new class of prophylactic medicine promoting the regeneration of healthy skin and improving scar appearance compared with controls," according to Mark Ferguson, of the University of Manchester, U.K., and colleagues. "With low doses injected locally around the time of surgery, avotermin is a well tolerated and convenient treatment. These studies suggest that avotermin has potential to provide an accelerated and permanent improvement in scarring."
The study was published April 9 in The Lancet.
More information
The American Academy of Dermatology has more about scars.

Naltrexone promising for treating kleptomania

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) – Naltrexone, a drug commonly used to treat alcoholism and drug addiction, reduces stealing urges and associated behavior in individuals with kleptomania, according to study results published in the current issue of Biological Psychiatry.
"Kleptomania appears to share many...similarities to substance use disorders: urges or cravings, tolerances, withdrawal, repeated unsuccessful attempts to cut back or stop, and impairment in areas of life functioning," Dr. Jon E. Grant and colleagues at the University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, point out.
Naltrexone belongs to a class of drugs called opioid antagonists, which among other functions, diminish "stealing-related excitement and cravings," they note.
In an 8-week clinical trial, the researchers examined the effectiveness and tolerability of naltrexone in 25 adults with kleptomania who were randomly assigned to receive naltrexone or placebo. Twenty-three subjects completed the study.
Significantly greater reductions in obsessive-compulsive characteristics associated with kleptomania were observed among patients assigned to naltrexone compared with those treated with placebo. The average effective dose of naltrexone was 116.7 milligrams per day.
Compared with patients receiving placebo, those taking naltrexone had significantly greater reductions in kleptomania symptoms and in overall kleptomania severity. The naltrexone group also had an increased positive response on measures of psychosocial functioning, as well as greater reductions in measures of depression and anxiety.
Most adverse drug affects were mild to moderate in intensity and occurred during the first week of treatment.
The effectiveness of naltrexone in this study provides additional support to the hypothesis that pharmacological manipulation of the brain's opiate system can target the primary symptoms of kleptomania, Grant and colleagues conclude.
SOURCE: Biological Psychiatry, April 1, 2009.